Pastor Frank
2005-01-05 03:21:43 UTC
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:06:13 GMT, "George Hammond"
The question is a paradox; did you not notice?
If your god is immortal, it *cannot*, die.
If your god is omnipotent, it can do anything, including, die.
Your god cannot logically be both,
We are not talking about what God can or cannot do, but what God[Hammond]
After all... there is always some jerk in the crowd who will
"If God can do anything; can he commit suicide?"
Well, the answer to that is.... sure he can... but he doesn't
want
to,
so he doesn't.
Oh my.After all... there is always some jerk in the crowd who will
"If God can do anything; can he commit suicide?"
Well, the answer to that is.... sure he can... but he doesn't
want
to,
so he doesn't.
The question is a paradox; did you not notice?
If your god is immortal, it *cannot*, die.
If your god is omnipotent, it can do anything, including, die.
Your god cannot logically be both,
wants
to do. Is God "immortal" by necessity of by choice? The answer of
By choice, for to God ALL things are possible. See below
Pastor Frank
Jesus in Mk:10:27: And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men
it
is
impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
solely
to the newsgroup to which is was appropriate. You completely ignored
it, and here you are again stuffing your god nonsense into
sci.physics.relativity again.
Very well.
Your god is a figment of your imagination, and even it it existed it
is
totally
impotent and worthless. You pathetically thank it when you get what
you
want, never blame it for a crisis, instead attributing natural
disasters
to a different god, "Mother Nature". You are an arse-kissing lackey,
hoping
with a prayer that you'll get to live on after your death in some
imaginary
Nirvana or Shangri-la without ever lifting so much as a finger to
assist
in bringing it about.
Your god hasn't done anything yet and never will, it only exists in
your
own unthinking and incompetent mind. You babble about what was
written
some 2000 years ago in a book that was written by some scribe long
after the event, ranting about what is and is not possible, as if you
knew
the difference. You are as crazy as Hammond, but you don't know it.
At least he knows he's been hospitalized. You should be too.
I often joke about bright green flying elephants laying eggs in the
wormholes of the fabric of space, but the readers know it's a jape
and so do I. You, on the other hand, don't know the things you talk
about are just as stupid as my bright green flying elephants.
Now do me a favour, and take your nonsense away from the science
groups, we discuss the internal reflection and refraction of light
here,
not about rainbows being a sign from some imagined god who
flooded the entire Earth on a whim. Yes, there was a flood. The
ice age ended and the polar caps melted 11,000 years ago.
In short, stick up your own arse where you keep your brain.
Androcles.
that the
definition of the word "God" is a powerful and invisible old hairy
warrior
in the sky, something akin to Zeus or Odin, rewarding those he likes
and
zapping those he doesn't.
All your diatribe above doesn't apply to Christ, who was a superb
ancient philosopher and great psychologist.
Try reading the below references carefully and with understanding
and the light might yet come on.
LOL! Got himself killed, and just before he died he suddenly realised
"Eloi, eloi, lama sabachthani.", which being translated means "Holy
Shit, it didn't work".
Of course, he did manage a couple of minor magic tricks, water into wine
and treating a few people to some reject fish sandwiches from
"Long John Silvers" when they were too stupid to bring their own lunch.
No thanks.
Androcles.
who can't even find the right NGs to post to? Guys like you will laugh at
anyone and anything.
I will post you over to where your pals are